55.Shopping has developed from a necessary activity to a kind of entertainment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Introduction:
Shopping has been a staple activity for people throughout history, with different societies and cultures having their own unique ways of acquiring goods and services. However, in recent times, shopping has evolved from a necessary task to a leisure activity and a source of entertainment. In this essay, I will explore the extent to which I agree or disagree with the statement that shopping has become more of an entertainment than a necessity.
Body Paragraph 1: Arguments in favor of shopping as entertainment
One argument in favor of shopping as entertainment is that it provides people with a sense of excitement and pleasure. Shopping has become a social activity, where people enjoy browsing through stores, trying on clothes, and finding new and interesting items. Additionally, shopping centers and malls are designed to be entertaining, with a variety of shops, restaurants, and attractions that make it an enjoyable and fun experience.
Body Paragraph 2: Arguments against shopping as entertainment
On the other hand, some people believe that shopping as entertainment is a negative trend and contributes to the commercialization of society. It encourages people to spend money they may not have on items they do not necessarily need, leading to debt and financial problems. Furthermore, it takes people away from more meaningful and productive activities and can be addictive, leading to a waste of time and money.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, I agree that shopping has become more of an entertainment than a necessity for some people. While it can be an enjoyable and fun experience, it can also have negative consequences if not managed properly. Therefore, it is important for individuals to be mindful of their spending habits and to balance the pleasure of shopping with the practical needs and financial realities of their lives.

75. Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.
Do you agree or disagree?
Which other types of job should be highly paid?

Introduction:
Entertainment has been a source of enjoyment and leisure for people for many years, and the rise of technology has led to an increase in the reach and popularity of entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians, and sports stars. However, this has also led to the question of whether they are paid too much money.
Main Body:
On one hand, some people argue that entertainers deserve to be paid high salaries because they bring joy and entertainment to millions of people and they are able to command high prices due to the demand for their work. Furthermore, the nature of their work often requires them to have a high level of talent, which deserves to be rewarded.
On the other hand, there are those who believe that entertainers are paid far too much money, and that their salaries are often disproportionate to the salaries earned by other professionals such as doctors, teachers, and engineers who make important contributions to society. They argue that it is unacceptable for a single person to earn such large amounts of money when many people struggle to make ends meet.
Regarding other jobs that should be highly paid, many people argue that professions in healthcare, education, and public service such as doctors, teachers, and firefighters deserve to be paid high salaries due to the critical nature of their work. These professionals are responsible for saving lives, educating the next generation, and keeping communities safe, which are essential tasks that should be highly valued and rewarded.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, there is no definitive answer as to whether entertainers are paid too much money or not. It depends on individual perspectives and values. However, it is important to recognize the contributions made by professionals in other fields and to ensure that they are fairly compensated for the important work they do.